Curly’s Corner Shop, the blog!

April 30, 2008

Why vote?

Filed under: Democracy, England, North-East, South Shields, South Tyneside — curly @ 10:18 am
Tags: ,

Ballot paperWhat should motivate me to go to the polling station?

I’ve just walked back from school in the middle of a heavy rain shower thinking, if the weather is like this tomorrow then what would motivate me to get another soaking by going to a South Shields polling station?

Our local government elections have an unenviable track record for making people stay at home regardless of the weather, is that people feel disengaged or uninvolved with local politics? Why is there a sense of futility about the exercise?

South Tyneside Borough Council like hundreds of others in England and Wales is responsible for spending hundreds of millions of pounds of our money, and then raising some of it from council taxes, which we all perennially complain about, yet only around 38% of us bother to take the time to involve ourselves in the business of deciding who should spend this money for us, or to question why they should spend it all. Local councils provide services that we all use in fashion or another, education for our children, social care for the elderly, street cleansing and waste collection, street lighting and highways maintenance, library services, local amenities and sports facilities, cemeteries and crematoria, planning and licencing services, and a plethora of other legal obligations put upon them by central government.

These are all elements of our normal daily lives which from time to time we all find fault with and have a good old moan and groan about, yet more than half of us do not seem bothered about helping to decide who’s fingers should control the purse strings. It’s our money, surely you would think that more of us would be interested! No, apparently not, we don’t go to the poll because we cannot be bothered, they are the same, they are in it for what they can get out of it, the weather was too rotten, what difference does it make anyway? All standard excuses that we give year in year out.

I’d be motivated in any case, because I am one of those who cares passionately about the area that I was born and brought up in, I feel that the decision that I make at the ballot box will help shape the future for the next two years at least, and that in the longer term my children may benefit from the decisions that we make tomorrow. However, I often consider what our political parties are doing to interest me, and more importantly those eighteen year olds who may be about to vote for the first time. It’s certainly true that most of them are only active on the streets of South Shields in March and April, it’s certainly true that only some of them produce literature for their local candidates in the wards for us to read, some either don’t bother or don’t have the finances to produce material, leaving us to rely on newspapers, or even websites!

Here is one of my major complaints, todate I have received literature from the Labour Party and the Progressives in my ward, I have looked at the website for the Labour Party in South Shields, the Green Party in south Tyneside, and the Independent Alliance, I understand that the South Tyneside Progressives have a website somewhere but it isn’t showing up in Google searches, and unfortunately there are no official sites for the Lib-Dems or Conservatives locally. The interesting and frankly shocking fact is that none of these websites are truly interactive, they can allow us to contact someone by email and hope for a response, but you won’t find any user friendly polls, or blog style comment facilities, or even details of where they meet, or how to join in. Yet this is the digital age, a time when they have all tried with pilot schemes to increase voter turnout at local elections by offering postal voting on demand, voting by text or email, and even suggested voting at your favourite supermarket. They say they listen but their websites don’t even reach out.

Another question I have asked myself is, should I ignore national politics when it comes to local elections? In years gone by by was inclined to say that I most certainly should, but I’m older and wiser now, and I realise that you simply cannot divorce and separate the two. National government is entwined in local government as much as spaghetti is entwined with bolognese sauce, it provides the great majority of the cash used by our local councils by way of central grants and it dictates how much of that cash should be spent, it also provides obligations that councils must follow administer, enact, and enforce parts of national legislation. So realistically we cannot ignore the policies of the government of the day when it comes to our town halls. There is a balance to be sought between national policy and local initiatives and I need to realise that my local council tax is as much decided by national government as it is by my local councillors.

Therefore it is reasonable to question just why council tax has doubled during the period since Labour was elected in 1997.

So why vote?

I’ll vote because I know that my local ward councillors ought to be there to represent my views in the town hall, that’s whether I voted for that particular ward councillor or against them, they have a duty to represent the whole ward and collectively the whole borough of South Tyneside. I’ll vote because I know that local councillors still have some influence over how are lives are affected in South Tyneside, I’ll remember that I am one of the 25% of households here who pay the full amount (non discounted) of council tax. I’ll be like like many other people who will vote because I want to send a message to Gordon Brown too, and hope that he’ll listen!

More importantly I’ll vote to defend my right to complain, carp, and generally moan when things don’t look right, without casting that vote I don’t consider that I have a right to moan! Have you ever considered it that way? Unless you vote and help decide the future of the borough, then do you reasonably have a right to complain about things you don’t like?

I’ll vote for people who offer to make a difference, and if they are successful I’ll be happy, if they don’t deliver they will face me again in two years time. I’ll vote for a party or organisation that has a well produced plan of ideas and policies that appeal to me, and I’ll not vote for those who cannot be bothered to offer a meaningful map of policies.

I’ll vote for children and for my elderly relatives, because they deserve the benefit of my choice in how they are to be looked after, I’ll consider the effect of politicians plans for my local environment and how it will be affected in future years. I’ll vote because this is a democracy, a nation that was twice threatened in war by a repressive regime that believed strongly in a one party state, I’ll remember that millions of people died to protect my right to decide how I should live in free, liberal, democratic state. The supreme sacrifices that they made should not be forgotten and I feel duty bound to continue the type of lifestyle that they died to protect.

I’ll vote because I still believe that it matters, not just to me, but to those who live around me, in my street, in my neighbourhood, in our schools.

A poor turnout tomorrow will not be good for democracy, it will only confirm that people are not fully engaged by political parties and see little relevance in their attempts to converse for a few short weeks at this time of year. But please consider all of the above and put this matter to one side for now, it was ever thus, but by participating in the electoral process you may help to change minds, the political wannabes may actually take notice if more people tramp along in the rain to a polling station, they may actually respond one day and involve us all further throughout the year.

Please use your vote, and remember why we are privileged to have one!

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

4 Comments »

  1. Curly!
    Notice you’re complaining (again) about paying an extra £4/500 per year in Council Tax since 1997 but, assuming from what you say that you are a house owner, you don’t mention the tens of thousands of pounds by which your house (and mine and many others in Shields)has gone up in the same time. Are you seriously saying that there should be no relation between a property tax ( for that’s what Council Tax is ) and the value of the property?

    Comment by Westy — April 30, 2008 @ 5:58 pm

  2. I don’t see things that way at all, council tax was never ever intended to be some sort of tax on wealth or property, it was designed to be a charge on services used.Besides what value is there in property if one has absolutely no intention of selling it anyway!

    Council Tax is a necessary evil because politician’s have not yet come up with a better answer for financing local government in a manner which allows service users to exercise some accountability. The original ideals in Thatcher’s hated Poll Tax have been lost in the “reforms”, i.e. that EVERYBODY on the electoral roll pays something towards the finances of their local council, no matter how small. The fact that the current charge falls on a household does not come anywhere near this ideal of everyone pays something.

    There are many households in this borough (and country) who pay nothing at all for the services they receive, how can they possibly understand or account for how their elected politicians behave? When it comes to electing local councillors just how can they evaluate value for money and council taxes?

    There are other silly anomalies too, take three identical homes in the same street, house one has a married working couple with two grown children, also working and earning, house two has a young couple with one earning, and house three has a single pensioner aged 65 who works ten hours per week at the local newsagent. Is it right that they should all receive identical bills for their council tax?

    No it isn’t, and neither would it be right to charge them on the value of their property either.

    The system we have now is far from perfect, but for now we are stuck with it, it is not a tax on property and was never intended as such, it is an evolution of a previous taxation system that the socialists hated more than anything else before, but have been happy to manipulate by creating more housing bands and looking towards the next valuation they want to include “value added” amenities such as the views from your windows, the closeness of the golf course, and the conservatory on the back!

    Comment by curly — April 30, 2008 @ 7:59 pm

  3. Curly
    Of course it’s a property tax. The more valuable your house is the more you pay (up to a certain point). It’s precisely because it is a property tax that it throws up the sort of anomalies that you so rightly point to.You ask what value has property if one has no intention of selling? What nonsense! Are you saying that if (heaven forfend) you snuffed it tomorrow your children would inherit something worthless? My point remains…all of the people mentioned in your paragraph on anomalies have made enormous gains in the last ten years and it is right that this is reflected in a corresponding increase in Council Tax.Is your alternative a return to the Poll Tax or perhaps a local income tax? Are you a closet Lib Dem?
    PS I forgot to mention that I agree with virtually everything else you said in your Why vote? blog

    Comment by Westy — April 30, 2008 @ 11:36 pm

  4. Financially, to me, my house is of little value. I have to live somewhere and although my home is very small, it falls into an E band for council tax purposes. As you rightly say it will only be of value when I snuff it. This house in another area might be in a band A or B. This is where council tax is so wrong. It is based on property but also on where in the country you happen to live. That is wrong. Unless I decide to up sticks and move to say, Durham (where well over 60% of properties fall into band A)

    I will continue to fall into band E unless this Government decides to do a revaluation, in which case my tiny 2 bedroomed bungalow is likely to fall into a band F or possibly even G. You may well say move, but why should I leave my family and friends? Why should I, now a pensioner, move to a strange part of the country, just to assuage the appetite of council tax? I do not use any more services than other council tax payers, if fact it is highly likely that I use less. We have no shop, no post office, no street lighting, no bus service within walking distance. The closest Hospital is almost thirty miles away and for all this convenience I pay a band E council tax. There are rich and poor are not confined to any area of the country but the unfairness is not addressed. Let’s take the average council tax from a couple of areas (rich and poor in both). The average council tax in Kingston-upon-Hull is £826, the average council tax in Kinston-upon-Thames is £1,607.00, almost double. Is that fair? I think not.

    A new way of funding local government must be a priority for any Government.
    It would be good to have local government that had control of its services and not the finger of Central Government in 94% of the pie

    Christine Melsom.
    Isitfair
    http://www.isitfair.co.uk

    Comment by Christine Melsom, — May 1, 2008 @ 10:51 am

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.