Big Brother database worry
Dizzy debunks the theory
I have to admit that I was extremely worried and annoyed when I read this story in The Times about further moves by New Labour to create yet another huge massive database that intends to peer into our private lives by snooping on our phone calls and emails. People in South Shields should worry over the intent and application of these “Big Brother” tactics and the direction that Gordon Brown’s government is taking as it steadily chips away at our privacy and civil liberties.
However it didn’t take Dizzy long to debunk the whole theory and to rubbish the achievements of Labour’s previous attempts to create working databases, what’s more he does it as a guest commenter in The Times, the boy has done well, showing that there is a role for the new media bloggers sitting comfortably within the mainstream media. Dizzy (Phil Hendron) describes it as “selling out”, I prefer to think of it more as “selling up” and making his views available to a much wider and possibly more discerning audience. Lets hope that we see more of Dizzy in The Times, and perhaps see other newspapers taking the opportunity to widen their appeal by adding a few bloggers to their writing resource 9Iain Dale is a regular with the Daily Telegraph and Paul Linford is a regular with the Newcastle Journal, although in reality he is a blogging journalist rather than a blogger per se.
Whilst we are on the subject of “Big Brother” and the “surveillance society” It is good to see that the Conservative Party is considering moves to restrict and regulate the role of CCTV cameras. Shadow Home Secretary David Davies that of the four million CCTV systems in Britain 90% of them are not fit for purpose and cannot provide images that are of evidence quality.
“There is no argument for having CCTV which both infringes on our civil liberty but is of such poor quality it does nothing to protect us or provide evidence to bring perpetrators of crime to justice - as happens now. Conservatives would ensure any CCTV has to be maintained at sufficiently high standard to provide evidence admissible in court. We would also strictly limit access to these images to the police and other relevant agencies until they get to court, and set a mandatory punishment for breaches of these rules that infringe the privacy of the individual.”
What he is not committing the party to, yet, is to restrict the number of new CCTV systems being added to the plethora that we already see in our streets, shops, buses, taxis etc. Money saved on some of these schemes could be diverted towards improved neighbourhood policing, which in my view will always be a better deterrent and investigative tool that a poorly maintained camera giving a grainy image.
One day, just for the hell of it, I’m going to walk from South Shields Market Place to the Ship and Royal on the corner of Mile End Road and count how many CCTV cameras I can see on the street and in the shops .
It could prove enlightening.














Foreign Secretary to be dealt a duff hand?
Go there and save me says Brown




